A total of 102 journalists from various media outlets have expressed concern over what they describe as a biased and opaque trial process at the International Crimes Tribunal (ICT).
In a joint statement issued on Monday, they warned that such a trial process threatens the rule of law.
The journalists said the recent situation surrounding the ICT — including statements from political actors, inconsistencies in trial proceedings, lack of transparency, and visible political influence — has raised serious questions about the impartiality of the court.
They noted that if the judiciary cannot operate independently, democracy, human rights, and the rule of law all come under threat.
The statement also highlighted growing debate at home and abroad regarding the ICT verdict against Awami League President Sheikh Hasina.
The journalists termed the alleged pressure on the court, the presentation of one-sided information, restrictions preventing the accused from appointing their own lawyers, and the government’s appointment of a lawyer “biased towards the opponent” as Hasina’s counsel as “absurd”.
They also expressed deep concern over allegations that defence lawyers faced mob intimidation during the trial.
The journalists said justice must be ensured through a transparent, impartial, and pressure-free process, following due legal procedure — elements they claim were absent in this case.
They added that the media has a responsibility to uphold the truth and safeguard judicial independence, stressing that dictated, influenced, or vindictive verdicts erode public trust in the judiciary.
The statement outlined four demands:
- Overturn the disputed verdict and conduct a completely transparent and impartial retrial.
- Ensure the court is free from political and administrative pressure.
- Allow all parties equal opportunity to appoint lawyers and present arguments and evidence.
- Ensure verdicts are based solely on truth, evidence, and law.
Concluding the statement, the journalists said they stand united in safeguarding democracy, independent journalism, and the rule of law, adding that justice is the foundation of the state — and its absence invites grave consequences.
